Ministers are considering implementing digital ID cards for children starting at the age of 13. The proposal has faced criticism, with opponents denouncing the move as unnecessary and alarming. Keir Starmer has expressed plans to introduce digital identification by 2029.
Advocates argue that digital IDs would aid in combating illegal immigration by requiring individuals seeking employment and housing to demonstrate their lawful presence in the UK. However, the initiative has triggered significant opposition, with nearly three million people signing a petition calling for its abandonment.
The government is deliberating on the inclusion of youths aged 13 and above. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper mentioned that many 13-year-olds already possess a form of digital ID. A consultation will explore the possibility of extending digital IDs to individuals under 16.
Supporters of the proposed ‘BritCard,’ linked to official records, believe it could enhance efforts against illegal migration and unscrupulous landlords. Labour Together suggested that the smartphone app for IDs would streamline right-to-rent and right-to-work verifications.
MPs Jake Richards and Adam Jogee emphasized that the ID cards would serve as a comprehensive tool for individuals to validate their right to reside in the UK. They estimated the setup costs for issuing BritCards to be between £140 million and £400 million.
Several countries, such as Estonia, Denmark, Spain, Canada, Australia, and Japan, have already implemented digital ID systems. Responding to concerns, the government clarified that the digital ID scheme is not mandatory but required for certain applications, aiming to simplify access to public and private services.
Campaign group Big Brother Watch has urged MPs to reject the digital ID proposals, labeling the inclusion of children in the biometric system as concerning and unwarranted. Director Silkie Carlo questioned the government’s intentions behind the digital ID initiative, especially regarding minors.
